Wikileaks reveals why King Gyanendra gave up power

Home Forums Chhalfal Wikileaks reveals why King Gyanendra gave up power

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #13019
      Admin
      Keymaster

      Recently released documents by Wikileaks reveal that Nepal’s former King Gyanendra gave up power because the Nepalese Army did not have enough ammunition left to suppress the rising protest in the country against the royal regime.

      KATHMANDU: When Nepal’s controversial king Gyanendra handed over power to a resurrected parliament on April 24, 2006 and faced the abolition of his throne, he might not have been entirely the thought of his subjects’ well being that prompted the move.

      Royalists say Gyanendra, who had seized power through a bloodless coup, stepped down because he wanted to avert bloodshed that would have occurred had the army been asked to take on the crowds demanding the restoration of democracy. The real reason could be that the Royal Nepalese Army (RNA) was running out of ammunition.

      In February and March 2006, days before the 19-days peaceful protests that paralyzed the royal regime started, the RNA’s arsenal had started dwindling alarmingly after its main arms suppliers, India, USA and UK, stopped providing arms the previous year to show their disapproval of the royal coup, according to the latest WikiLeaks revelations.

      In February, then RNA master of ordnance Major General Prakash Bahadur Basnyat had informed the US embassy in Kathmandu, once the army’s staunch supporter in its anti-Maoist terror campaign in Nepal, that the RNA had only 16,800 rounds of ammunition for its 16,000 M-16 guns. Also, for the 25,000 Insas firearms given by India at a 70% subsidy, it had only 130,000 rounds of ammunition left.

      Original Post – http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/wikileaks-discloses-why-nepal-king-gyanendra-shed-power/articleshow/9881252.cms

    • #12442
      lindseya
      Member

      Is it acceptable that Wikileaks has published secret conversations between governments? I love it how they’re exposing war crimes and crimes against humanity done by the U.S. empire, but do you think Assange is going too far in exposing what was supposed to be secret conversations between governments? Do governments have a right to secret conversations?
      ____________________
      yahoo keyword tool ~ overture ~ traffic estimator ~ adwords traffic estimator

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Connecting Global Nepali Speaking Communities